1 citation on this entry point at a Google News redirect rather than a publisher, so it can't be attributed or rated: Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
Credibility ratings combine two public datasets: Lin et al. 2023, PNAS Nexus 2(9):pgad286 (CC BY 4.0) for the domain-quality score, and Wikipedia's perennial-sources list (CC BY-SA 4.0) for the reliability tier. A rating describes an outlet's general record, never this particular article. Unrated means absent from those datasets — not a judgement.
This event sits inside Google Capex, which carries how it developed before and since.
Story 16 of 23 in this thread's timeline, oldest to newest
Adjacent threads (shared entities):
