OpenAI formalizing consumer health (ChatGPT Health went GA to all US 18+ on 07-23) exactly as its worst MH-harm litigation crystallizes (suicide/psychosis suits, a 42-state AG probe, Altman named personally). The open question: does a formal health layer RAISE the standard of care, or wall off 'health' while the general model keeps causing harm? Its own numbers — >1M/week showing suicidal-planning signals — are the liability.
Summary
OpenAI landed its first hospital-wide ChatGPT deployment days after taking Health general-availability to all US adults, even as harm litigation continues.
Whether formalizing a health layer raises OpenAI's standard of care, or simply walls off "health" while other harms continue elsewhere, is the open question.
1M/week surfacing suicidal-planning signals. ⚠ WebSearch budget exhausted
